Book of Concord study · Healing
Conversion
Psalm 30 · 1 Samuel 2:1–10 · Formula of Concord, Solid Declaration II
The Texts
Psalm
"O Lord my God, I cried to you for help, and you have healed me." (v. 2)
Reading
"The Lord kills and makes alive; he brings down to Sheol and raises up." (v. 6)
Book of Concord
Formula of Concord, Solid Declaration II
Hannah's canticle in 1 Samuel 2 is not a personal testimony about one woman's answered prayer. It is a theology of divine sovereignty compressed into a few verses, and the Apology of the Augsburg Confession treats it as exactly that. The Apology cites verse 6 directly, "The Lord kills and makes alive," and declares that by one of these, contrition is signified, and by the other, faith is signified. The killing is God's strange work: the Law driving the sinner into the knowledge of his own death. The making alive is His proper work: the Gospel that raises what the Law has slain. Formula of Concord, Solid Declaration II, takes this binary and constructs a doctrine. If God alone kills and makes alive, the human will contributes nothing to either operation.
Psalm 30 confirms the same testimony from the opposite direction. The psalmist does not describe a recovery in which his own resilience played a part. "O Lord my God, I cried to you for help, and you have healed me." He brought down to Sheol; He raised up. The movement from mourning to dancing, from sackcloth to gladness, is entirely God's act. Hannah sings the same truth from the banks of her own Sheol: the barren woman bears seven children, and the one who trusts in his own strength is shattered. Both texts arrive at the same border the Formula of Concord will defend with precision: the boundary between God's work and the human response that follows from it, but never precedes it.
Discuss
The Apology cites 1 Samuel 2:6 to show that killing and making alive correspond to contrition and faith. Hannah's canticle arose from a deeply personal experience of barrenness and birth. What does the movement from her private suffering to this universal theological claim show us about how the Confessions read the Old Testament narratives of rescue and restoration?
Key Terms
| Term | What It Means |
|---|---|
| Subjectum convertendum | That which is to be converted. The Formula's term for the unregenerate will: not an agent in conversion but the object on which God works, as clay in the potter's hands. |
| Pure passive | Purely passive. The Formula's description of the human will before conversion: it does nothing but suffer God to work in it. It receives grace; it does not contribute to it. |
| Synergism / the three causes | The error the Formula refutes: that conversion has three concurrent causes, the Word, the Holy Spirit, and the human will assenting and not resisting. Before conversion the Formula allows only two efficient causes: the Word and the Holy Spirit. |
| Modus agendi | God's way of working with rational creatures. He does not drag them physically but uses the external Word. Through preaching, the Holy Spirit breaks the heart, works contrition, and kindles faith in the forgiveness of sins. |
Discuss
The Formula identifies synergism's three causes as the Word, the Holy Spirit, and the human will not resisting. The error sounds modest: the will is merely one of three contributors, and it contributes only by not fighting. Why does the Formula treat this modest concession as a decisive corruption of the doctrine of conversion?
Worse Than a Stone
The Formula of Concord does not merely say that the unregenerate will is weak or impaired. It declares that before conversion a man cannot understand, believe, accept, will, begin, or cooperate in his conversion either wholly, or half, or in any, even the least or most inconsiderable part. Luther's description of the unregenerate will as a pillar of salt, a log, a stone, and a lifeless statue is cited approvingly. The language is meant to close every door through which a residual human contribution might enter.
Yet the Formula adds a distinction that sharpens the image further. The unregenerate man is in a worse condition than a block of wood or a stone, not a better one. A stone does not actively resist the hand that moves it. The natural man is at absolute enmity against God and fiercely, actively resists the Holy Ghost until God unilaterally converts him. The comparison to inanimate objects is not meant to flatter the will into passivity; it is meant to show that the will's problem is not merely absence of motion but active opposition. Psalm 30's psalmist did not help God bring him up from Sheol; he was brought.
Discuss
The Formula insists that the unregenerate will does not merely fail to reach upward toward God but actively resists Him. How does this distinction between passive inertia and active enmity change the way a pastor should speak about the unbeliever's condition, and what does it require of the Gospel proclamation that must reach him?
The Rejection of Synergism
The historical occasion for Solid Declaration II was the Synergistic Controversy, in which Philip Melanchthon and Victorinus Strigel taught that man is not entirely spiritually dead but only, as they put it, badly wounded and half dead. Melanchthon introduced the formula of three concurring causes in conversion: the Word of God, the Holy Spirit, and the human will assenting to and not resisting the Word. The Formula's response is total. Before conversion there are only two efficient causes: the Holy Spirit and the Word of God. The unregenerate will is the subjectum convertendum, the thing to be converted, not a cause of its own conversion.
The Formula's description of the unregenerate will as pure passive before conversion means it does nothing but suffer God to work in it, as a potter works clay. This is not a description of the will's dignified reception of grace; it is a description of its utter inability to initiate, sustain, or assist its own transformation. Hannah's canticle does not say that the barren woman half-opened her womb and God supplied the rest. The Lord opens the womb and closes it, kills and makes alive, as He alone sees fit.
Discuss
Melanchthon's three-cause formula sounds pastoral: it preserves room for human dignity and avoids the impression that God drags people into the kingdom. The Formula rejects it entirely. Where does your congregation encounter the three-cause assumption in its actual piety, and what would it look like to correct it without producing fatalism?
God's Way of Working
If the will is purely passive in conversion, the natural question is how God moves a rational creature without treating him the way He moves a stone. The Formula answers with the modus agendi, God's specific way of working with rational beings. He uses the external means of grace: the preaching and hearing of the Word. Even the unregenerate man retains enough civil freedom of the will to go to church and hear a sermon. Through that outward hearing, the Holy Spirit breaks the heart, works the terrors of contrition, and then kindles the spark of faith that receives the forgiveness of sins.
The Formula's formulation is precise: "God, through the drawing of the Holy Ghost, makes out of stubborn and unwilling men willing ones." He does not wait for willingness; He produces it. Once regenerated, the renewed will is no longer idle, and the converted man cooperates in all the works of the Holy Ghost. The Formula explicitly refuses, however, the analogy of two horses pulling a wagon together, which would imply equal partnership. The regenerate will cooperates entirely through the new powers given by the Spirit, and only so long as God rules, guides, and leads him. If God were to withdraw His hand, the believer could not persevere in obedience for a single moment.
Discuss
The Formula says God makes out of unwilling men willing ones, and that the regenerate will cooperates but not as an equal partner in harness. Where does the Formula draw the boundary between genuine human response and synergistic cooperation, and how should a pastor preach that boundary to a congregation without making the people feel they have no real part in their own faith?
The Payoff
Psalm 30's dancing and Hannah's seven children are not the products of human resilience finally rewarded by a gracious God. They are the products of the same sovereign act that raised Jesus Christ from the dead, the only One in whom God's killing and making alive reached its final and decisive form. The Formula of Concord defends the passivity of the human will in conversion not to diminish the believer but to protect the Gospel: the one who was dead in trespasses and raised to faith by the Holy Spirit through the Word may know with absolute certainty that his conversion rests on God's unilateral act, and that the God who made him willing once will not abandon him to the native powers of his flesh.