Why Confessional Lutheranism  ·  Article I of V

The Sacrament Is for Sinners, Not the Worthy

You were drawn to the altar by its beauty and reverence. Good. Now ask what is actually being given there, and to whom.

You walked into a Catholic parish or an Orthodox cathedral, and something hit you that you had never felt in the evangelical church where you grew up. The incense. The chanting. The priest vested in garments that said, without a word, that something sacred and dangerous was happening at that altar. The congregation knelt. Nobody clapped. Nobody told you to turn to your neighbor and share your feelings. The worship was directed at God, not at you, and for the first time in your life, you felt like you were in the presence of the holy.

That experience was not false. You encountered reverence, and reverence is the proper response to the presence of the living God. The evangelical tradition that lost you deserved to lose you. A sanctuary that looks like a concert venue, a sermon that sounds like a TED Talk, a communion service treated as an afterthought with grape juice in plastic thimbles: these things communicate that the Sacrament does not matter much. You concluded that it does matter, and you were right.

Here is the question you have not yet asked: what exactly is happening at that altar, and for whom is it happening?

+ + +

Rome will tell you that the Eucharist is the re-presentation of the sacrifice of Calvary, that the priest acts in persona Christi to make the body and blood of Jesus truly present under the appearances of bread and wine, and that receiving this Sacrament confers grace upon the communicant. So far, a Confessional Lutheran has no quarrel. Christ is truly present. The Sacrament truly gives what it promises. The body and blood are not symbols. They are reality.

The quarrel begins when Rome tells you who may receive it.

To approach the Catholic altar, you must be in a "state of grace." If you have committed what Rome classifies as mortal sin (and the list is long: missing Mass on a Sunday of obligation, sexual sin, serious anger, any number of offenses that Rome's moral theology catalogs with painstaking precision), you are forbidden to receive communion until you have gone to a priest, confessed your sin, received absolution, and performed the assigned penance. If you receive communion in a state of mortal sin, Rome teaches that you eat and drink judgment upon yourself. The Sacrament that is supposed to deliver forgiveness becomes, in practice, a Sacrament you must be sufficiently forgiven to receive.

Sit with that for a moment. The medicine is only for those who can prove they are already recovering.

Orthodoxy operates differently in its theology but arrives at a strikingly similar destination. To receive the Divine Liturgy, you are expected to have fasted (the rules vary by jurisdiction, but serious fasting is the norm), to have prayed the preparatory prayers, and to have been to confession recently. In many Orthodox parishes around the world, laypeople commune infrequently, not out of indifference, but precisely because the preparation requirements are so weighty that most people do not feel ready. The Sacrament is surrounded by so much reverent distance that the "for you" nearly disappears behind the demands you must meet before you may approach.

The reverence is real. Grant that without hesitation. The question is whether the reverence has become a wall.

Do you want a Sacrament you must qualify for, or a Sacrament that qualifies you?

Open Luke 22 and look at the men sitting at the table the night Jesus instituted the Lord's Supper. Judas is there. He has already agreed to hand Jesus over for thirty pieces of silver. The rest of the Twelve are there, and within minutes of receiving the bread and wine, they will argue among themselves over which of them is the greatest. Peter is there, the man who will swear on his life that he is ready to follow Jesus to prison and to death, and who will deny three times before dawn that he even knows the man.

These are the first communicants. A betrayer. A room full of men jockeying for status. A denier. Not one of them is in a "state of grace" by any meaningful definition. Not one of them has adequately prepared. Not one of them is worthy.

Jesus gives them His body and blood anyway.

Luke, unlike Matthew and Mark, places the prediction of Judas's betrayal after the institution of the Supper. That means Judas ate the bread and drank the cup. The hand of the betrayer was on the table at the very moment Jesus was giving Himself away. If Christ had intended the Sacrament only for the worthy, He would have withheld it from Judas. He did not. If He had intended it only for the adequately prepared, He would have waited until the disciples stopped arguing about greatness. He did not wait. He gave.

"This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me." And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, "This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood." — Luke 22:19–20

The words do not say "given for you once you have earned it." They do not say "poured out for you on the condition that you never fail." They say: given for you. The "for you" is the main thing. Luther's Small Catechism identifies these words ("given and shed for you for the forgiveness of sins") as the heart of the Sacrament, and teaches that this forgiveness carries with it life and salvation. The "for you" demands nothing except the faith to receive it.

+ + +

The objection from the Roman side is a serious one. Paul wrote to the Corinthians that whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord, and that a person should examine himself before eating. Does this not prove that worthiness is a prerequisite?

It does not. Paul is writing to people who were turning the Lord's Supper into a drunken banquet while their poorer brothers went hungry. The "unworthy manner" is not a failure to achieve a sufficient internal state of holiness. It is a failure to recognize what the Supper is. To eat and drink "without discerning the body" is to treat the Sacrament as ordinary food, as something that has no particular significance. The examination Paul calls for is not an audit of whether you have sinned too gravely to approach. It is the recognition that what you are receiving is the true body and blood of Christ, given and shed for the forgiveness of your sins.

The difference matters enormously. Rome turns self-examination into a prerequisite checklist: have you confessed all mortal sins? Are you in a state of grace? Have you fasted for one hour? Confessional Lutheranism reads Paul in the opposite direction. You examine yourself not to determine whether you are good enough, but to determine whether you are needy enough. Do you recognize that you are a sinner? Do you believe that Christ's body and blood are truly present in this bread and wine? Do you trust that they are given for the forgiveness of your sins? Then come. The Sacrament is for you. It was always for you. That is the whole point.

Luther put it bluntly in the Large Catechism. The Sacrament is given "because we daily live in the midst of so much that attacks us." It is medicine for the sick, not a trophy for the healthy. If you had to be well before you could take the medicine, the medicine would be useless. You do not wait until the infection clears to take the antibiotic. You take it because you are infected. Christ does not distribute His body and blood to reward the righteous. He distributes it to forgive the sinful. If you are not a sinner, you do not need it. If you are, it is precisely for you.

The altar is not a charging station for the weary. It is a place for the spiritually bankrupt.

Some of you reading this have already felt the weight of the Roman or Orthodox system, even if you have not yet named it. You went to confession, and for a few days you felt clean, and then you sinned again, and the question crept back in: Am I in a state of grace right now? Can I receive communion this Sunday, or do I need to go to confession first? The cycle is relentless. Sin, confess, receive, sin, confess, receive. At its best, this cycle is simply Christian life (we are daily sinners who daily receive mercy). At its worst, it becomes a treadmill, and the Sacrament becomes something you are perpetually one mortal sin away from losing access to.

Confessional Lutheranism does not eliminate confession. The Lutheran confessional tradition practices and values individual confession and absolution as a gift, not a gate. The difference is that your access to the altar does not depend on whether you have recently passed through the confessional. Your access depends on Christ's invitation, and Christ's invitation is not withdrawn when you fail. He gave His body and blood to Judas. He is not going to withhold it from you.

+ + +

This is for the young men who are reading this and weighing their options.

You are attracted to Rome and Orthodoxy in part because they seem serious about the Sacrament, and you are right that seriousness matters. A communion service that feels like an afterthought is a communion service that has forgotten what it is distributing. You want to kneel at an altar where the body and blood of Christ are treated as the most sacred reality in the room. You should want that.

You can have it without the treadmill.

Confessional Lutheran parishes chant the historic liturgy. The pastor wears vestments and stands at an altar, not behind a coffee table. The congregation kneels to receive the body and blood of Christ. The words of institution are spoken over real bread and real wine, and the confession, with the ancient Church, is that what you receive is the true body and true blood of Jesus Christ, in, with, and under the bread and wine. No memorializing. No symbolizing. Christ said "is," and Confessional Lutherans believe Him.

The difference is in what those words "for you" are allowed to mean. In a Confessional Lutheran parish, "for you" means for you: the sinner who walked in off the street with a week's worth of failure behind him, the man who lost his temper with his wife on the drive to church, the man who is struggling with lust and anger and doubt and has not managed to beat any of them yet. You do not need to prove that you have beaten them. You come to the altar precisely because you have not. The Sacrament does not require your worthiness. It creates it. Christ's body, given for you, is what makes you worthy to receive Christ's body given for you.

That is not laxity. That is the Gospel.

The men at the table in the Upper Room were not worthy. Judas was plotting betrayal. The Twelve were about to argue over their own greatness. Peter was hours from denying Christ to a servant girl. Jesus gave them His body and blood, freely, without conditions, because the gift does not depend on the worthiness of the recipient. It depends on the faithfulness of the Giver. That Giver is Christ, and He has never once failed to keep His word.

You do not have to choose between reverence and the Gospel. You do not have to choose between beauty at the altar and certainty that you are welcome there. Confessional Lutheranism gives you both: the reverence and the radical, reckless, scandalous generosity of a God who gives His own body and blood to sinners who do not deserve it and never will.

Come to the altar. It is for you.

This is the first article in a five-part series on why Confessional Lutheranism delivers what Rome and Orthodoxy promise.
The series follows the Passion of Christ through the Gospel of Luke, from the table to the tomb.